IS CHURCH REFORMATION STILL POSSIBLE?
A look back.
In the 1930s, Dietrich Bonhoeffer came to Union Theological Seminary in New York, looking for fellow believers. What he found instead disturbed, angered, and perplexed him. There is no theology here, he wrote to a German colleague. The New York churches, if possible, were even worse: They preach about virtually everything; only one thing is not addressed… namely, the gospel of Jesus Christ, the cross, sin and forgiveness, death and life.
What Bonhoeffer is today and was for American Protestantism, Alexis de Tocqueville is today and was for Democracy in America, a cultural and political analysis of the new republic, which appeared a century earlier. But what the German theologian found was, if possible, more significant than the observations of the French aristocrat: Protestantism in America was a Protestantism without Reformation.
Is a Reformation at this late hour, still possible?
In 1987 – now almost 40 years ago – my oldest son gave me a book by Walter Brueggemann, an Old Testament Scholar, published in 1978, entitled, The Prophetic Imagination. Dr. Brueggemann was then – 47 years ago – at the start of his long career. Now, at 91, he is still active, still writing books and essays.
On the very first page of this significant book, Brueggemann wrote – confirming Bonhoeffer’s observation – “The contemporary American church is so largely enculturated to the American ethos of consumerism that it has little power to believe or to act… That enculturation is true not only of the institution of the church but also of us as persons.
On the very last page of this slender book – 113 pages – he points to a concept dear to my heart: “Jesus’ concern was finally, for the joy of the Kingdom. That is what he promised and to that he invited people.”
Books galore: who will inherit them?
I also have this book of 1,100 pages by the Oxford Professor, Dr. Diarmaid MacCulloch,“CHRISTIANITY, The First Three Thousand Years. This learned man points out that the church has seen ‘the Kingdom concept’ as too controversial and too difficult for the person in the pew, to understand. He cites the Lord’s Prayer, where the phase “Give us this day our daily bread”, appear mistranslated, based on a wrong interpretation of the Greek word epiousios which does not translate as ‘daily bread’ at all. He states that it may point to the new time of the coming Kingdom.
Dr. MacCulloch writes on page 89: in The Lord’s Prayer, Jesus “moves straight from addressing the Father in heaven to the plea ‘Thy Kingdom Come’,” adding that apparently, Jesus sees THE KINGDOM and its coming, as the most pressing of all present and future events.
Another scholar, Dr. Herman Ridderbos, wrote The Coming of the Kingdom, in which he asserts that the entire Bible has been written with THE KINGDOM as its central message.
My question: “have you ever heard a sermon on the meaning of THE KINGDOM? Have you ever heard an explanation of this? Matthew 6: 33 urges us to “Seek first the Kingdom and his righteousness.” J.H. Bavinck, in his book Between the Beginning and the End: A Radical Kingdom Version, devotes an entire chapter to THE KINGDOM.
Here is how he starts this chapter: “The concept of the Kingdom of God resounds like a majestic chorale through the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation.” He summarises the chapter by stating: “The central point of the gospel is not us poor humans and our pain and suffering, rather, its entire focus is aimed at the unique and powerful reality that God wants to reinstate his kingdom. And a sentence later comes this hammer blow: “There is no such thing as individual salvation. All salvation is of necessity universal”.
All salvation universal?
Yes: That indicates that personal redemption and the redemption of Creation, go hand in hand. That’s why our task in life is to LIVE for the welfare of Creation!
That is the radical gospel.
“Is a church Reformation still possible?” I asked.
That is an important question, but the church has painted itself in a corner, prioritizing the Bible over Creation, in defiance of John 3: 16-17, where it states – and I will say it again – For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. Jesus came not to condemn the world, but to save the world.
Jesus’ death and resurrection took place to restore creation so that, when he returns – now more imminent by the day – a New Creation awaits us. That old creation – the one we daily experiencing – is worn out and in danger of becoming a threat rather than a refuge. We have abused it – and still are – to the point of imminent collapse. Jesus came not to save souls – whatever than means – but to bring LIFE as John 10: 10 testifies: “I have come to bring LIFE and that to the full.
That’s the Reformation we need, because: Christianity is not a religion: It is a way of life! It no longer is Ecclesia Reformata, Semper Reformanda, no longer a church always reforming. Now it is Homo Reformatus, Semper Reformandus, meaning, A Reformed Person, Always Reforming. The Bible disappears: a new Creation dawns, while the meek – those who claim little – will inherit the earth. (Psalm 37: 11).